Submission Statement:

Sean Kirkpatrick has now officially stated (via Greenstreet) that he is done commenting on the UFO/UAP topic after getting caught in a massive outright contradiction exposed by Brandon Fugal about his prior involvement in the UAP subject despite his and the Pentagon's claim he had no prior UAP involvement and was an unbiased and objective investigator.

It reminds one of what was done during the Condon Committee where the lead physicist Edward U. Condon was sold to the public as an independent and objective scientist looking into the UFO phenomena but was, in fact, directly involved with the CIA and USAF to debunk and quell public interest in UFOs.

Now, journalist Christopher Sharp is reporting that the Pentagon is refusing to address some basic questions on this seemingly apparent contradiction:

[1] https://x.com/ChrisUKSharp/status/1801714217537421317 :

The Pentagon tonight is refusing to answer some basic questions about Dr Sean Kirkpatrick and his apparent prior involvement in the UAP topic - not disclosed to the public at any point during his AARO role.

[2] https://x.com/ChrisUKSharp/status/1801715249755693528 :

They never miss a beat when it comes to undermining Lue Elizondo or the wider UAP topic, like they did with their press operations relating to the flawed UAP Historical Report

But as soon as an awkward question comes their way, they will stonewall you

[3] https://x.com/ChrisUKSharp/status/1801715640924881236 :

For instance, it took me weeks just to confirm that Lue Elizondo was working with Space Force.

Confirming that role should have been so simple and basic.

It was clear that the Pentagon did not want to bolster Lue's credentials.

1 / 3
2 / 3
3 / 3
Comments (0)

Want to leave a comment?

Sort by: New