Lets say you:
1. Duplicate all of a male human's dominant genes over their recessive genes before he is born, and call him Adam.
2. Clone a female version of Adam named Eve.
3. Have them reproduce.
Is there fault in my logic to believe their children would be genetic copies of them? If there is not, would it even be feasible to duplicate the dominant genes over the recessive genes?
Aa = AA
BB = BB
cc = cc
Dd = DD
EE = EE
ff = ff
Edited 1 year ago
This is an archived submission. You won't be able to comment.
Comments (12)
Want to leave a comment?
Sort by: Best
The offspring would be inbred if the female is a genetic copy of the male.
Holy shit, you're actually a fucking retard.
If the male and female are genetically identical that's the highest level of inbreeding possible. Sorry to ruin your fantasy of fucking a female version of yourself. Get over it.
Once again, nigger, you don't understand what inbreeding is or how it works. Inbreeding results in an increase in the chances of offspring being affected by recessive traits. Duplicating dominant genes over recessive genes eliminates this chance.
What kind of little pussy are you that you get triggered by a casual comment on some stupid hypothetical situation?
The kind that porks your mum like the little piggy she is