they're but one factor in a complex equation of unabashed retardation. The fedora-tippers are responsible for as many god-awful threads as the trad-larpers, and they both find themselves in good company with the /pol/ colonists and /int/ tourists and other assorted schizophrenics and zoomer polemicists. The man with a genuine desire to learn and discuss history is a stranger there, a foreigner on what should be his own board. I won't allow the same to happen on /s/history, and that means nipping all of these problems in the bud.
it's not about the wording, it's about the substance. No one ever says something like that without being dead-set on starting pointless arguments and degrading the general quality of discussion. Simply put, I don't think there is a way to reword the post so that it ceased to be bait.
I'll play devil's advocate and speak your language, so to speak. I could go the traditional route but you're an edgy racist.
Hitler killed a lot of white people. Like a lot. More than anyone ever had at that point in History (soon 1-UPed by Stalin).
He was so far right and left a scar so deep that the once mega-racist-towards-jews Europe swung back hard to the left to compensate. He's the reason you have so much immigration in Europe, because people don't want to be like nazis. He's the reason the white race is dying. He's probably the biggest reason as to why white countries today are so liberal and progressive.
sorry anon, but i've seen how that stuff sent /his/ down the shitter, and i don't want the same to happen with /s/history.
if anything >>>/his/ is a shithole because of the religionfags rather than anyone else
they're but one factor in a complex equation of unabashed retardation. The fedora-tippers are responsible for as many god-awful threads as the trad-larpers, and they both find themselves in good company with the /pol/ colonists and /int/ tourists and other assorted schizophrenics and zoomer polemicists. The man with a genuine desire to learn and discuss history is a stranger there, a foreigner on what should be his own board. I won't allow the same to happen on /s/history, and that means nipping all of these problems in the bud.
how would you reword OP's post instead to make it more compliant with your guidelines?
it's not about the wording, it's about the substance. No one ever says something like that without being dead-set on starting pointless arguments and degrading the general quality of discussion. Simply put, I don't think there is a way to reword the post so that it ceased to be bait.
why
cause I asked for one reason to hate him
I'll play devil's advocate and speak your language, so to speak. I could go the traditional route but you're an edgy racist.
Hitler killed a lot of white people. Like a lot. More than anyone ever had at that point in History (soon 1-UPed by Stalin).
He was so far right and left a scar so deep that the once mega-racist-towards-jews Europe swung back hard to the left to compensate. He's the reason you have so much immigration in Europe, because people don't want to be like nazis. He's the reason the white race is dying. He's probably the biggest reason as to why white countries today are so liberal and progressive.
>Hitler killed a lot of white people
proof?
>He's the reason you have so much immigration in Europe
so u r racist?