>all revenue from it counts as your own for taxation purposes
general/limited partnership:
>you share ownership with someone else
>general partners are typically involved in day-to-day management of a company
>they're also equally and jointly liable for everything, meaning one of them can do something illegal, and everyone would be liable for it and pay in proportion to their obligations
>limited partners don't manage much; they usually just provide cash
>they're aren't liable for someone else's actions and vice versa
>everybodies income from the company is taxed, but not the company itself
limited liability partnership:
>pretty much the same thing as limited partners, but without the restrictions on management and no need for damages to be paid in proportion to obligation
limited liability company:
>generally (though not necessarily), a partnership where, depending on whether it's member-managed or manager-managed, is usually ran by everyone, or by one person or group of persons that everyone else appoints
>limited liability means that, once the companies' assets are dried-up from damages or what have you, nobody can come after your personal assets (with some exceptions in cases of criminal wrong-doing)
>is usually taxed in the same way as partnerships, though this can be changed to that of a corporation if desired
corporations:
>has a lot of people who run it in different ways i.e. CEO, COO, board of directors, etc.
>has the same limited liability of LLCs
>is subject to double taxation, where the profits of the company is taxed, and then the income of it's shareholders are also taxed
>mostly chosen for the numerous ways to gather capital that it has
Franchise:
>basically the same thing as a corporation, but it rents out it's marketing to others for a fee
it's not about the wording, it's about the substance. No one ever says something like that without being dead-set on starting pointless arguments and degrading the general quality of discussion. Simply put, I don't think there is a way to reword the post so that it ceased to be bait.
that idea actually sounds really good to me. would be kino if i could call myself "Great Khagan" or something like that. as for additional function, i can't really think of any. maybe get rid of the captchas. otherwise, nothing comes to mind.
>anon realizes he has to go out to find love instead of waiting for it to come to him
surprised it took him so long.
sole proprietorship:
>you own and run the company all by yourself
>all revenue from it counts as your own for taxation purposes
general/limited partnership:
>you share ownership with someone else
>general partners are typically involved in day-to-day management of a company
>they're also equally and jointly liable for everything, meaning one of them can do something illegal, and everyone would be liable for it and pay in proportion to their obligations
>limited partners don't manage much; they usually just provide cash
>they're aren't liable for someone else's actions and vice versa
>everybodies income from the company is taxed, but not the company itself
limited liability partnership:
>pretty much the same thing as limited partners, but without the restrictions on management and no need for damages to be paid in proportion to obligation
limited liability company:
>generally (though not necessarily), a partnership where, depending on whether it's member-managed or manager-managed, is usually ran by everyone, or by one person or group of persons that everyone else appoints
>limited liability means that, once the companies' assets are dried-up from damages or what have you, nobody can come after your personal assets (with some exceptions in cases of criminal wrong-doing)
>is usually taxed in the same way as partnerships, though this can be changed to that of a corporation if desired
corporations:
>has a lot of people who run it in different ways i.e. CEO, COO, board of directors, etc.
>has the same limited liability of LLCs
>is subject to double taxation, where the profits of the company is taxed, and then the income of it's shareholders are also taxed
>mostly chosen for the numerous ways to gather capital that it has
Franchise:
>basically the same thing as a corporation, but it rents out it's marketing to others for a fee
thanks. i genuinely don't understand how i fixed it, but it's nice to be back on here again.
based if true.
>anon doesn't realize that buying a game out of spite is just as retarded as boycotting a game out of spite.
looks great
cool
The Bible
>BBQ sauce
>Cheese
>Pineapple
>Grilled Chicken
>Ham
>Bacon
>Mushrooms
this is what I usually get.
>dude, just surrender your autonomy and become completely reliant on an inefficient and outdated mode of transportation!
>bro, it will totally work bro, trust me, it won't be run by an inept bureaucracy or leave rural areas neglected and isolated.
this is what city slickers actually believe.
based
i can see why you put all that effort in, this piece of art should never be forgotten.
aight
this is pretty good stuff
nice
idk, just anything interesting, I guess.
Some super obscure Vtuber whose name i will not mention to keep her obscure.
was it worth it anon?
hey
I love it, and I think people who don't are weirdos.
nah, i think the current system works well enough.
sorry anon, but i've seen how that stuff sent /his/ down the shitter, and i don't want the same to happen with /s/history.
it's not about the wording, it's about the substance. No one ever says something like that without being dead-set on starting pointless arguments and degrading the general quality of discussion. Simply put, I don't think there is a way to reword the post so that it ceased to be bait.
>edit
that idea actually sounds really good to me. would be kino if i could call myself "Great Khagan" or something like that. as for additional function, i can't really think of any. maybe get rid of the captchas. otherwise, nothing comes to mind.
weird, because i still get them. The profile thing sounds cool though, being able to customize them a bit would be great.