it's not about the wording, it's about the substance. No one ever says something like that without being dead-set on starting pointless arguments and degrading the general quality of discussion. Simply put, I don't think there is a way to reword the post so that it ceased to be bait.
that idea actually sounds really good to me. would be kino if i could call myself "Great Khagan" or something like that. as for additional function, i can't really think of any. maybe get rid of the captchas. otherwise, nothing comes to mind.
I honestly preferred Voyager to TNG. Sure many points of it where pretty bland, but the premise of the show was fairly novel and the plot-structure was pretty interesting imo. Couldn't stand TNG tho, i just found everything about it to be insufferable, excepting the klingon episodes, those were great.
>DS9 was the most un-Star Trek series of the pre-2005 shows.
honestly, that's probably why I prefer it to the rest. Not so much because it's dark or cynic, but more because it's just more interesting. With most Star-Trek shows, everything is very episodic. The crew just stumbles on a planet facing a crisis or something, do some science all over it, wax philosophical, and the move on to the next adventure. DS9 however is a lot different by the simple virtue of staying put in a single place. They can't just dump a load of science in Bajor and the wormhole and expect that to solve all of their problems. They got to really dig deep there, deal with all the Bajoran politics and Cardassian interference and prophet shenanigans and see how it all changes over time. I think this gave it the kind of complexity all of the other shows were sorely lacking-in.
if so, i'd use his to say some heinously racist stuff about Koreans and in particular Kim Jong-Un. Mostly i just want to see if i can start a war between best china and best korea and see which one would win.
hard to say, but probably God's Fury, England's Fire: A New History of the English Civil Wars, which was pretty good imo. There was also a trilogy about the history of the Seleucid empire, but i could only make it through half of the second book because the author kept sperging about dates every other paragraph. made it much more difficult to read than was strictly necessary.
same, and i absolutely hate it. It's especially obnoxious when they bring their retarded shouting matches into unrelated subjects because they're incapable of compartmentalizing.
i don't mean to be rude, but i think you've been listening to one too many tinder stories and taking them as facts about dating in general. Only the extremely picky women who use dating websites in the first place are that autistic about height, most of the rest of them are largely indifferent.
sorry anon, but i've seen how that stuff sent /his/ down the shitter, and i don't want the same to happen with /s/history.
it's not about the wording, it's about the substance. No one ever says something like that without being dead-set on starting pointless arguments and degrading the general quality of discussion. Simply put, I don't think there is a way to reword the post so that it ceased to be bait.
>edit
that idea actually sounds really good to me. would be kino if i could call myself "Great Khagan" or something like that. as for additional function, i can't really think of any. maybe get rid of the captchas. otherwise, nothing comes to mind.
weird, because i still get them. The profile thing sounds cool though, being able to customize them a bit would be great.
oops, got one of the names wrong, it should be Edward VI not Edward IV
that's be Henry VIII, and it's true, he really was an absolute lad, especially in his youth before he got fat.
cool, my mom does too.
haven't the foggiest.
he'd make for some good frog-leg chili.
>It was worse than TNG. Way, way worse.
I honestly preferred Voyager to TNG. Sure many points of it where pretty bland, but the premise of the show was fairly novel and the plot-structure was pretty interesting imo. Couldn't stand TNG tho, i just found everything about it to be insufferable, excepting the klingon episodes, those were great.
>DS9 was the most un-Star Trek series of the pre-2005 shows.
honestly, that's probably why I prefer it to the rest. Not so much because it's dark or cynic, but more because it's just more interesting. With most Star-Trek shows, everything is very episodic. The crew just stumbles on a planet facing a crisis or something, do some science all over it, wax philosophical, and the move on to the next adventure. DS9 however is a lot different by the simple virtue of staying put in a single place. They can't just dump a load of science in Bajor and the wormhole and expect that to solve all of their problems. They got to really dig deep there, deal with all the Bajoran politics and Cardassian interference and prophet shenanigans and see how it all changes over time. I think this gave it the kind of complexity all of the other shows were sorely lacking-in.
>he doesn't jealously guard his virginity until the age of 30 t obtain unparalleled wizard powers
NGMI
How will horse-girls ever recover?
my money is on the cybernetic lizard-man.
lol, i'm pretty sure the Gorillaz have already done that.
Stealth x City Sim
create a secret city of rat people in the sewers and prepare for your conquest of the surface dwellers.
Does Xi Jinping have a twitter account?
if so, i'd use his to say some heinously racist stuff about Koreans and in particular Kim Jong-Un. Mostly i just want to see if i can start a war between best china and best korea and see which one would win.
hard to say, but probably God's Fury, England's Fire: A New History of the English Civil Wars, which was pretty good imo. There was also a trilogy about the history of the Seleucid empire, but i could only make it through half of the second book because the author kept sperging about dates every other paragraph. made it much more difficult to read than was strictly necessary.
i don't think so, no.
lol, accurate
same, and i absolutely hate it. It's especially obnoxious when they bring their retarded shouting matches into unrelated subjects because they're incapable of compartmentalizing.
it can't hurt to learn this stuff either way. and who knows, maybe one day you'll be normie enough to make use of what you've learned there.
i don't mean to be rude, but i think you've been listening to one too many tinder stories and taking them as facts about dating in general. Only the extremely picky women who use dating websites in the first place are that autistic about height, most of the rest of them are largely indifferent.
it's kind of a garbage heap these days, but it's better than a lot of other places.