>DS9 was the most un-Star Trek series of the pre-2005 shows.
honestly, that's probably why I prefer it to the rest. Not so much because it's dark or cynic, but more because it's just more interesting. With most Star-Trek shows, everything is very episodic. The crew just stumbles on a planet facing a crisis or something, do some science all over it, wax philosophical, and the move on to the next adventure. DS9 however is a lot different by the simple virtue of staying put in a single place. They can't just dump a load of science in Bajor and the wormhole and expect that to solve all of their problems. They got to really dig deep there, deal with all the Bajoran politics and Cardassian interference and prophet shenanigans and see how it all changes over time. I think this gave it the kind of complexity all of the other shows were sorely lacking-in.
I honestly preferred Voyager to TNG. Sure many points of it where pretty bland, but the premise of the show was fairly novel and the plot-structure was pretty interesting imo. Couldn't stand TNG tho, i just found everything about it to be insufferable, excepting the klingon episodes, those were great.
historically accurate Gulag management sim. There's already games about Soviet border security and regular prisons, so I'm sure there's a market for this.
that idea actually sounds really good to me. would be kino if i could call myself "Great Khagan" or something like that. as for additional function, i can't really think of any. maybe get rid of the captchas. otherwise, nothing comes to mind.
it's not about the wording, it's about the substance. No one ever says something like that without being dead-set on starting pointless arguments and degrading the general quality of discussion. Simply put, I don't think there is a way to reword the post so that it ceased to be bait.
they're but one factor in a complex equation of unabashed retardation. The fedora-tippers are responsible for as many god-awful threads as the trad-larpers, and they both find themselves in good company with the /pol/ colonists and /int/ tourists and other assorted schizophrenics and zoomer polemicists. The man with a genuine desire to learn and discuss history is a stranger there, a foreigner on what should be his own board. I won't allow the same to happen on /s/history, and that means nipping all of these problems in the bud.
A lot of different things. There's everything you've already mentioned and the fact that the vast majority of the users are insufferable. They're always repeating the same unfunny jokes and references ad nauseam, always talk in that inane, obnoxious, smug tone, even when they're talking about something they clearly don't understand. these problems are present across the entirety of the internet, but they're especially potent on Reddit.
>DS9 was the most un-Star Trek series of the pre-2005 shows.
honestly, that's probably why I prefer it to the rest. Not so much because it's dark or cynic, but more because it's just more interesting. With most Star-Trek shows, everything is very episodic. The crew just stumbles on a planet facing a crisis or something, do some science all over it, wax philosophical, and the move on to the next adventure. DS9 however is a lot different by the simple virtue of staying put in a single place. They can't just dump a load of science in Bajor and the wormhole and expect that to solve all of their problems. They got to really dig deep there, deal with all the Bajoran politics and Cardassian interference and prophet shenanigans and see how it all changes over time. I think this gave it the kind of complexity all of the other shows were sorely lacking-in.
>It was worse than TNG. Way, way worse.
I honestly preferred Voyager to TNG. Sure many points of it where pretty bland, but the premise of the show was fairly novel and the plot-structure was pretty interesting imo. Couldn't stand TNG tho, i just found everything about it to be insufferable, excepting the klingon episodes, those were great.
what kind of flour do you think Anon made it with? maybe the kind made out of Kosovoan wheat?
he'd make for some good frog-leg chili.
what Et Tu said.
historically accurate Gulag management sim. There's already games about Soviet border security and regular prisons, so I'm sure there's a market for this.
it's literally me
haven't the foggiest.
cool, my mom does too.
that's be Henry VIII, and it's true, he really was an absolute lad, especially in his youth before he got fat.
oops, got one of the names wrong, it should be Edward VI not Edward IV
weird, because i still get them. The profile thing sounds cool though, being able to customize them a bit would be great.
>edit
that idea actually sounds really good to me. would be kino if i could call myself "Great Khagan" or something like that. as for additional function, i can't really think of any. maybe get rid of the captchas. otherwise, nothing comes to mind.
cool
nice video, thanks for sharing
same tbqh
it's not about the wording, it's about the substance. No one ever says something like that without being dead-set on starting pointless arguments and degrading the general quality of discussion. Simply put, I don't think there is a way to reword the post so that it ceased to be bait.
they're but one factor in a complex equation of unabashed retardation. The fedora-tippers are responsible for as many god-awful threads as the trad-larpers, and they both find themselves in good company with the /pol/ colonists and /int/ tourists and other assorted schizophrenics and zoomer polemicists. The man with a genuine desire to learn and discuss history is a stranger there, a foreigner on what should be his own board. I won't allow the same to happen on /s/history, and that means nipping all of these problems in the bud.
sorry anon, but i've seen how that stuff sent /his/ down the shitter, and i don't want the same to happen with /s/history.
nah, i think the current system works well enough.
A lot of different things. There's everything you've already mentioned and the fact that the vast majority of the users are insufferable. They're always repeating the same unfunny jokes and references ad nauseam, always talk in that inane, obnoxious, smug tone, even when they're talking about something they clearly don't understand. these problems are present across the entirety of the internet, but they're especially potent on Reddit.
nice. good job man.
I love it, and I think people who don't are weirdos.
Staying alive.